26 Mar

No Win No Fee Excursion Into History

The British government intend to reform a no win no fee system became obvious when Ken Clarke, UK Justice Minister, made an announcement on March 13, 2011. Initially, it was assumed that the new success fee rules will take effect from October 2012.

Clark suggested that legal fees should not be covered by the losing party, but deducted from the compensation due to the winning party. According to the head of the Ministry of Justice, the plans aimed at making the justice system more balanced and equally fair for all the parties. At the same time the government was in favor of limiting attorneys’ fees to 25% from compensation in contrast to the earlier proposal for 10 percent of the amount. The government’s proposal was supported by parliamentarians, but the authoritative figures expressed concern that the government’s plans can go too far. According to them, the desire to limit the success fee could lead to the lawyers’ dramatically low interest even in the accident claims doomed for success. Indeed, judging by the tendencies at Solicitors Guru, the largest platform that gathers hundreds of licensed lawyers and agencies in the country, the branch is flourishing, pop in and find a solicitor.

A no win, no fee system was introduced in the UK as a result of the reform of the judicial system, held in 1999. It enabled solicitors to operate within the framework of conditional fee arrangement. With the introduction of this system an ‘After the Event’ insurance mechanism was born. These actions contributed to a real revolution: the system has become extremely actively used by both providers and consumers.

Initially, the government believed that the reforms, carried into effect, will make a solid contribution into more accessible legal services. Additionally, such rules should have become a perfect incentive for a lawyer: thus, the center of gravity shifts to an overall success of the case, not on the time spend to achieve positive results. So if you want know more about practical matter of this – read detailed explanations of no win no fee conception on the specialized source.

01 Mar

European Gambling Regulation Aspects Nuances

The material is prepared by a large gambling reviewing website – Apnet Casino, a platform finding itself on the crest of a wave and investing wisely in research activities.

To date, gambling establishments are allowed in the 128-countries, and Europe is one of the most gambling-saturated regions. Gambling houses present in virtually all the countries of the union with the exceptions of San Marino, Liechtenstein and the Greek part of Cyprus. European laws, which govern the operation of casinos, are relatively liberal. At the same time, the administration of a gambling house is obliged to independently control their customers. The basic attitude of European countries to the gaming business is to ‘resolve and control’. Europeans have realized that prohibiting such activities is senseless, because gambling generates heaps of money that considerably replenish state budget. In addition, the ban will only lead to an increase in the number of shadow casinos, and a complete lack of knowledge of the state in this sector. Read More